Dawn Ball v. Famiglio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “an affirmance of a district court’s dismissal does not” count as a strike
• concluding that allegations of poor medical care that “may prove detrimental to [plaintiff's] health over time . . . do not represent ‘imminent dangers’”
• holding that “dismissal based on the immunity of the defendant . . . does not constitute a PLRA strike, including a strike based on frivolousness, unless a court explicitly and correctly concludes” so
• recognizing that when the plain text of an order dismisses a case based on an enumerated ground, the dismissal counts as a strike even if the underlying analysis hinges on a legal issue that otherwise would not trigger a strike
• explaining that if affirmative defense appears on face of complaint, court can dismiss complaint under Rule 12(b)(6)
• explaining that if affirmative defense appears on face of complaint, court can dismiss complaint under Rule 12(b)(6)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).