Skip to main content
· 6/4/1999

Rusenstrom v. Rusenstrom

Citations

  • 981 P.2d 558
  • 1999 Alas. LEXIS 76
  • 1999 WL 357365

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that hearsay evidence is normally admissible if there is no objection
  • applying de novo review to denial of motion to modify child support

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Matthews, Compton, Eastaugh, Fabe, Bryner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.