Haynes v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding probation officer’s instruction to not visit victim’s house “was not a routine supervisory direction but essentially amounted to a new condition of probation which a probation officer is without authority to prescribe”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McPherson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1988-09-15· cited 30×
• Ballance v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-03-16· cited 29×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1989-01-17· cited 18×
• Miller v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-05-18· cited 9×
• Goley v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1991-08-08· cited 7×
• Thomas v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-07-18· cited 7×
• Ramirez v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-03-06· cited 6×
• Roff v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-10-26· cited 3×
• Parissay v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1997-01-03· cited 3×
• Schlup v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-12-15· cited 2×
• Pinnock v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2018-01-12
• BRYAN FACEN v. THE STATE OF FLORIDA
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2023-08-30

Cites

6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Hutchinson v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-03-23· cited 19×
• Holterhaus v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-07-23· cited 13×
• Blake v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1983-06-17· cited 13×
• Winfield v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-11-17· cited 11×
• Watts v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1982-03-01· cited 6×
• Young v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1981-06-22· cited 6×