Mungaray v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that admissions by appellant and her lawyer and undisputed admissions by the State was enough evidence to connect appellant to prior conviction and support a trial court’s cumulation order
• deciding merits of appellant's challenge to sufficiency of evidence supporting cumulation order despite absence of trial objection to order
• deciding merits of appellant’s challenge to sufficiency of evidence supporting cumulation order despite absence of trial objection to order
• deciding merits of appellant’s challenge to sufficiency of evidence supporting cumulation order despite absence of trial objection to order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).