Skip to main content

In re A.M.

Citations

  • 577 S.W.3d 653

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • providing that “the State need only make a showing of the reason by a preponderance of the evidence”
  • holding Section 54.02(a) and (f) factors have no relevance in Section 54.02(j) proceeding
  • asking whether State proved that it was impracticable for State for reasons beyond its control, “to file a petition and obtain a transfer ruling from juvenile court before the child’s eighteenth birthday”
  • “As with any decision that lies within the trial court’s discretion, the question is not whether we might have decided the issue differently.”
  • “As with any decision that lies within the trial court’s discretion, the question is not whether we might have decided the issue differently.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Keyes, Landau

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.