Skip to main content

Davis v. State

Citations

  • 637 S.E.2d 431
  • 281 Ga. App. 855
  • 2006 Fulton County D. Rep. 2972
  • 2006 Ga. App. LEXIS 1169

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the indictment was sufficient to charge criminal attempt to purchase cocaine when the “buyer” was a confidential informant and there was no actual cocaine involved
  • in prosecutions for criminal attempt or conspiracy, it is not necessary for the State to establish all elements of the underlying crimes
  • “As long as the declarant testifies at trial and is available for cross-examination by the defendant, the purpose behind the hearsay rule is satisfied.”
  • “As long as the declarant testifies at trial and is available for cross-examination by the defendant, the purpose behind the hearsay rule is satisfied with regard to his declarations.” (footnote and punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ruffin, Smith, Phipps

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

15 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

20 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.