Skip to main content

Miller v. Reynolds

Citations

  • 216 Va. 852
  • 223 S.E.2d 883
  • 1976 Va. LEXIS 215

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the merger doctrine applicable to the execution of deeds does not apply in cases of mutual mistake
  • recognizing that often a deed is only part of a prior existing contract, and parol evidence may be admitted to prove other terms not inconsistent with the deed
  • noting that the \deed is a mere transfer of title” and that the contract \may, and often does, contain many provisions which the execution of the deed neither adds to nor takes away from”
  • a condition in the purchase contract making the sale contingent upon the land's suitability for percolation and its qualification for a building permit did not merge into the deed
  • \The remedy of rescission is equitable in nature and is a remedy granted or denied within the sound discretion of the trial court.\
  • “A deed is a mere transfer of title, a delivery so to speak of the 12 subject-matter of the contract.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harrison

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Miller v. Reynolds

6 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.