Skip to main content
· 9/16/2010

Abi-Najm v. Concord Condominium, LLC

Citations

  • 699 S.E.2d 483
  • 280 Va. 350
  • 2010 Va. LEXIS 229

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that “the question whether the economic loss doctrine applies requires a court first to determine ‘whether a cause of action sounds in contract or tort’” (quoting Richmond Metro., 256 Va. at 558)
  • holding that “the question whether the economic loss doctrine applies requires a court first to determine ‘whether a cause of action sounds in contract or tort’” (quoting Richmond Metro., 256 Va. at 558)
  • holding that when the alleged fraud occurred “before a contract between the two parties came into existence, . . . it cannot logically follow that the duty . . . allegedly breached was one that finds its source in the [c]ontracts”
  • stating that, when a circuit court decides a cause of action on a demurrer, “we review the circuit court’s judgment de novo”
  • stating that false representation of promise with a ‘present intention not to perform’ was fraudulent intent
  • noting that a contract permitted one of the parties to “substitute substantially equivalent materials and finishes” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Donald W. Lemons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.