Skip to main content

Miller v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 359 S.E.2d 841
  • 5 Va. App. 22
  • 4 Va. Law Rep. 389
  • 1987 Va. App. LEXIS 266

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that malice and passion cannot co-exist
  • “Heat of passion may result when one is provoked to fear or rage or both.”
  • “Miller fired two shots; one missed and one struck the victim’s side. A jury could find from the evidence that Miller did not act maliciously, but acted upon a reasonable provocation, in the heat of passion.”
  • “If all of the evidence demonstrates that the accused reflected or deliberated, that his passion cooled, or that there was reasonable time or opportunity for cooling, then the wounding is attributable to malice and not heat of passion.”
  • jury instructed on definition of “maliciously” an element of malicious wounding

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cole

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.