Skip to main content

Caudill v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 497 S.E.2d 513
  • 27 Va. App. 81
  • 1998 Va. App. LEXIS 193

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the “evidence was insufficient as a matter of law to prove ‘heat of passion’” where “at most,” the appellant and victim “exchanged ‘harsh words’ before the attack”
  • finding that in order to maintain a heat-of-passion defense, the defendant must prove that he committed the crime with \passion\ and upon \reasonable provocation\
  • holding that the trial court was not required to instruct the jury on heat of passion because the evidence in the record showed only that defendant and the victim exchanged “harsh words” before defendant slashed the victim’s face with “a shiny object”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benton, Coleman, Bumgardner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

11 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.