Sixth Circuit· 7/6/2001

Miller v. Alldata Corp.

Citations

14 F. App'x 457

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding district court did not abuse its discretion in allowing plaintiff to present opinion testimony that defendant had “discriminated against her”
affirming district court's denial of motion for remittitur of $300,000 award for emotional distress where the plaintiff recovered only $16,000 in economic damages for gender discrimination claim
affirming district court’s denial of motion for remittitur of $300,000 award for emotional distress where the plaintiff recovered only $16,000 in economic damages for gender discrimination claim
affirming jury verdict of $300,000 under Michigan law to plaintiff who experienced disparate treatment on the basis of her gender, was ultimately terminated, and experienced emotional distress as a result
affirming the district court’s denial of a motion for remittitur where a jury awarded the plaintiff in a gender discrimination case $300,000 for emotional distress and only $16,000 in economic damages
“The after-acquired evidence rule, which this Court first applied in the employment discrimination context in Johnson v. Honeywell Information Sys., Inc., 955 F.2d 409 (6th Cir. 1992

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Malley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.