Skip to main content
· 10/9/1996

K & T Enterprises, Inc., D/B/A Dairy Queen of Blissfield, and Tahani Khoury v. Zurich Insurance Company, Cross-Appellee

Citations

  • 97 F.3d 171
  • 1996 U.S. App. LEXIS 26367
  • 1996 WL 577407

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • cautioning that federal courts must consider making that distinction, because many states have the separate motions rather than a single motion for judgment as a matter of law
  • finding public policy precluded recovery for losses sustained due to an insured’s arson
  • imputing conduct to the corporation based on less than total control
  • \The parties ... cannot determine this court's standard of review by agreement. Such a determination remains for this court to make for itself.\
  • district court should apply law of the forum state when reviewing Rule 50 motion challenging state law claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Merritt, Contie, Boggs

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.