Miguel Gutierrez v. Michael Kermon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• cautioning that an appellant “effectively pleads himself out of court by interpos- ing disputed factual issues in his [legal] argument”
• explaining that warrantless arrest “may be supported by probable cause that the arrestee committed any offense, regardless of which crime was charged or which crime the officer thought had been committed”
• dismissing interlocutory appeal of denial of qualified immunity because appellant's argument depended on disputed fact
• dismissing interlocutory appeal based on “a genuine factual dispute in need of a jury’s attention”
• dismissing interlocutory appeal of denial of qualified im- munity because appellant’s argument depended on disputed fact
• reiterating limits of appellate jurisdiction over appeal from denial of qualified immunity and stating that a party \effectively pleads himself out of court by interposing disputed factual issues in his argument\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).