Skip to main content

Michelson v. Duncan

Citations

  • 386 A.2d 1144
  • 1978 Del. Ch. LEXIS 494

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that when there was no factual support for the plaintiff’s allegations as to the interest of certain directors, the fact that such “interest” was not recited in the proxy materials was a meritless contention
  • observing that stockholders were informed of the essential facts because “[t]hey were provided with the complete text of plaintiff’s complaint, and, all alleged wrongs for which ratification was sought were enumerated in detail”
  • observing that stockholders were informed of the essential facts because “[t]hey were provided with the complete text of plaintiff’s complaint, and, all alleged wrongs for which ratification was sought were enumerated in detail”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hartnett

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

18 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

16 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.