Ninth Circuit· 2/20/2020
Michelle Ford v. Andrew Saul
Citations
- 950 F.3d 1141
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that an ALJ’s reliance on qualified, cogent, and uncontradicted expert testimony generally constitutes substantial evidence in support of the ALJ’s finding
- holding that ALJ reasonably discounted doctor’s opinion about claimant’s ability to work where the claimant testified that she could work occasional eight-hour shifts for FedEx
- holding that an “ALJ may permissibly reject check-off reports that do not contain any explanation of the bases of their conclusions” (internal quotation marks omitted)
- holding that “[t]he court will uphold the ALJ’s conclusion when the evidence is susceptible to more than one rational interpretation”
- holding that “[a] conflict between a treating physician’s opinion and a claimant’s activity level” supports rejection of the physician’s opinion
- holding that medical source opinion that described abilities as “limited” and “fair” were not useful in determining a claimant’s RFC
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Leslie Woods v. Kilolo KijakaziNinth Circuit· 2022-04-22· cited 1,825×
- Jeremy Kitchen v. Kilolo KijakaziNinth Circuit· 2023-09-14· cited 206×
- Sarahrose Kilpatrick v. Kilolo KijakaziNinth Circuit· 2022-05-27· cited 125×
- Tyrone White v. Kilolo KijakaziNinth Circuit· 2022-08-08· cited 99×
- Lorain Ann Stiffler v. Martin O'MalleyNinth Circuit· 2024-05-28· cited 89×
- Brian Glanden v. Kilolo KijakaziNinth Circuit· 2023-11-16· cited 75×
- James Wischmann v. Kilolo KijakaziNinth Circuit· 2023-05-17· cited 69×
- Juanita Cross v. Martin O'MalleyNinth Circuit· 2024-01-05· cited 67×
- James Terry v. Andrew SaulNinth Circuit· 2021-05-28· cited 59×
- Christopher Obrien v. Frank BisignanoNinth Circuit· 2025-07-01· cited 17×
- Nadon v. BisignanoNinth Circuit· 2025-07-25
- Ortiz v. BisignanoNinth Circuit· 2026-06-24
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Richardson v. PeralesSupreme Court· 1971-05-03· cited 22,864×
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court· 1976-02-24· cited 16,859×
- Biestek v. BerryhillSupreme Court· 2019-04-01· cited 12,652×
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 12,026×
- Molina v. AstrueNinth Circuit· 2012-04-02· cited 5,375×
- Maureen Thomas v. Jo Anne Barnhart, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2002-01-24· cited 4,989×
- Tackett v. ApfelNinth Circuit· 1999-06-25· cited 4,755×
- Deborah L. Burch v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner of Social SecurityNinth Circuit· 2005-01-20· cited 4,563×
- Orn v. AstrueNinth Circuit· 2007-07-16· cited 4,142×
- Lester v. ChaterNinth Circuit· 1995-11-03· cited 3,990×
- Tommasetti v. AstrueNinth Circuit· 2008-07-17· cited 3,958×
- Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeNinth Circuit· 1995-05-01· cited 3,694×
- Jana M. Bayliss v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2005-11-02· cited 3,474×
- Carmickle v. Commissioner, Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2008-07-24· cited 3,454×
- Armstrong v. ManzoSupreme Court· 1965-04-27· cited 2,943×
- Sullivan v. ZebleySupreme Court· 1990-02-20· cited 2,580×
- Robbins v. Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2006-10-26· cited 2,546×
- Valentine v. Commissioner Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2009-07-20· cited 2,431×
- Kathryn C. Rollins v. Larry G. Massanari, Acting Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2001-08-17· cited 2,116×
- Bradley Lewis v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of the Social Security AdministrationNinth Circuit· 2001-01-02· cited 1,925×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.