Raymond E. ANDREWS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donna E. SHALALA, Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that it is “solely the province 8 of the ALJ to resolve conflict[s]” between medical opinions
• holding that it is the ALJ’s duty to resolve conflicts in the record, and where the ALJ arrives at a rational conclusion that is supported by the record, the ALJ’s decision must stand
• holding that “the report of a nonexamining, nontreating physician need not be 13 discounted when it ‘is not contradicted by all other evidence in the record’” (quoting 14 Magallanes, 881 F.2d at 752 (emphasis in original)
• holding that “the report of a nonexamining, nontreating physician need not be 15 discounted when it ‘is not contradicted by all other evidence in the record’” (quoting Magallanes, 16 881 F.2d at 752 (emphasis in original))
• holding that it is the 19 ALJ’s job to resolve any conflicts
• holding that “the report of a 13 nonexamining, nontreating physician need not be discounted when it ‘is not contradicted by all 14 other evidence in the record’” (quoting Magallanes, 881 F.2d at 752 (emphasis in original))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).