Skip to main content
Ninth Circuit· 7/1/2025

Christopher Obrien v. Frank Bisignano

Citations

  • 142 F.4th 687

Oral arguments

Source: CourtListener oral-argument corpus (CC0).

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that “[s]ubstantial evidence means only[] such relevant evidence as a 25 reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion”
  • finding that the Meanel rule remains intact 19 “to the extent [it holds] that claimants generally may not present new evidence [in federal 20 court], and new issues dependent on that evidence, that they failed to present to the ALJ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

1 case in this archive cites this case.

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.