Veterans Claims· 9/15/2006
Michael W. Canady v. R. James Nicholson
Citations
- 20 Vet. App. 393
- 2006 WL 2660634
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a Board decision dismissing without prejudice a request for revision on the basis of clear and unmistakable is a final decision for purposes of the Court's jurisdiction
- noting that manifestly changed outcome might be “obvious from the context of the pleadings” or “inferred from a sympathetic reading”
- noting that manifestly changed outcome might be \obvious from the context of the pleading\ or \inferred from a sympathetic reading\
- noting that manifestly changed outcome might be \obvious from the context of the pleadings\ or \inferred from a sympathetic reading\
- noting that a request for revision that fails to comply with the pleading requirements \'shall be dismissed without prejudice to refiling'\ (quoting 38 C.F.R. § 20.1404(b))
- noting that in reading a pro se request for CUE sympathetically “the Board should view the claim in light of the fact that it is the assertion of CUE itself that requires specificity,” but “a manifestly changed outcome might be inferred from pro se pleadings”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Kasold, Moorman, Davis
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael T. Acciola v. James B. PeakeVeterans Claims· 2008-12-05· cited 31×
- Jerrold C. Bowen v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2012-06-29· cited 3×
- Roberto v. Ortiz v. Eric K. ShinsekiVeterans Claims· 2010-03-03· cited 2×
- Justiniano Delrio v. Robert L. WilkieVeterans Claims· 2019-12-19
- Rocco v. Perciavalle v. Denis McDonoughVeterans Claims· 2021-12-03
- Kenneth H. Dojaquez and Phillip Poole v. Denis McDonoughVeterans Claims· 2022-08-29
- Roger W. Wiker v. Denis McDonoughVeterans Claims· 2023-05-12
Cites
65 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 20,645×
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court· 1985-03-19· cited 11,658×
- Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentSupreme Court· 1998-03-04· cited 10,096×
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court· 1948-03-08· cited 9,383×
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court· 2001-06-18· cited 3,086×
- Kerr v. United States Dist. Court for Northern Dist. of Cal.Supreme Court· 1976-06-14· cited 2,854×
- Gilbert v. DerwinskiVeterans Claims· 1990-10-12· cited 2,831×
- Quackenbush v. Allstate InsuranceSupreme Court· 1996-06-10· cited 2,158×
- Ciralsky v. Central Intelligence AgencyD.C. Circuit· 2004-01-30· cited 1,014×
- Digital Equipment Corp. v. Desktop Direct, Inc.Supreme Court· 1994-06-06· cited 964×
- Bankers Life & Casualty Co. v. HollandSupreme Court· 1953-11-30· cited 826×
- De Beers Consolidated Mines, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1945-06-18· cited 810×
- James Hoskins v. John PoelstraSeventh Circuit· 2003-02-28· cited 459×
- Great Southern Fire Proof Hotel Company v. JonesSupreme Court· 1899-01-10· cited 402×
- Allday v. BrownVeterans Claims· 1995-04-14· cited 363×
- Russell v. PrincipiVeterans Claims· 1992-10-06· cited 358×
- Ahmed v. DragovichThird Circuit· 2002-06-10· cited 347×
- Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman EstatesSeventh Circuit· 1988-04-20· cited 279×
- Howard F. Roberson, Claimant-Appellant v. Anthony J. Principi, Secretary of Veterans AffairsFederal Circuit· 2001-05-29· cited 213×
- Donovan Edward Ruby v. Secretary of the United States NavyNinth Circuit· 1966-06-02· cited 210×
Other cases named Michael W. Canady v. R. James Nicholson
1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.