Coniston Corporation v. Village of Hoffman Estates

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a village board's alleged misapplication of a municipal zoning ordinance did not present a due process concern
• holding that a village board’s alleged misapplication of a municipal zoning ordinance did not present a due process concern
• holding that a village board’s alleged misapplication of a municipal zoning ordinance did not present a due process concern
• holding that the district court would not have had jurisdiction over a mandamus claim against state officials even if it had jurisdiction over related federal claims
• holding that a \violation of state law is not a denial of due process law\ where plaintiffs' due process claim sought review of Board of Trustees' zoning decision under state law
• suggesting that the takings clause of its own force, rather than the concept of substantive due process, forbids takings for solely private uses

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).