Skip to main content

Wright v. Jeckle

Citations

  • 104 Wash. App. 478
  • 16 P.3d 1268

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that the doctor was liable under the CPA for selling fen-phen (citing Eriks v. Denver, 118 Wn.2d 451, 465, 824 P.2d 1207 (1992))
  • finding that the doctor was liable under the CPA for selling fen-phen
  • upholding CPA claim based on the “advertising, marketing, and sale of diet drugs”
  • permitting a Consumer Protection Act claim against a doctor independent of chapter 7.70 RCW because the conduct complained of was not the manner in which the doctor practiced medicine but rather how he engaged in “the business of selling diet drugs”
  • permitting a Consumer Protection Act claim against a doctor independent of chapter 7.70 RCW because the conduct complained of was not the manner in which the doctor practiced medicine but rather how he engaged in \the business of selling diet drugs\
  • When a doctor’s entrepreneurial activities are not “health care” under chapter 7.70 RCW, a plaintiff “should ... be allowed to bring an independent action . . . alleging that entrepreneurial activities violate the CPA.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sweeney

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

12 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.