Court of Appeals of Washington· 1/25/2001
Wright v. Jeckle
Citations
- 104 Wash. App. 478
- 16 P.3d 1268
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding that the doctor was liable under the CPA for selling fen-phen (citing Eriks v. Denver, 118 Wn.2d 451, 465, 824 P.2d 1207 (1992))
- finding that the doctor was liable under the CPA for selling fen-phen
- upholding CPA claim based on the “advertising, marketing, and sale of diet drugs”
- permitting a Consumer Protection Act claim against a doctor independent of chapter 7.70 RCW because the conduct complained of was not the manner in which the doctor practiced medicine but rather how he engaged in “the business of selling diet drugs”
- permitting a Consumer Protection Act claim against a doctor independent of chapter 7.70 RCW because the conduct complained of was not the manner in which the doctor practiced medicine but rather how he engaged in \the business of selling diet drugs\
- When a doctor’s entrepreneurial activities are not “health care” under chapter 7.70 RCW, a plaintiff “should ... be allowed to bring an independent action . . . alleging that entrepreneurial activities violate the CPA.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sweeney
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
12 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Michael v. Mosquera-LacyWashington Supreme Court· 2009-02-05· cited 93×
- Ambach v. FrenchWashington Supreme Court· 2009-09-24· cited 34×
- Wright v. JeckleWashington Supreme Court· 2006-10-12· cited 32×
- Jeckle v. CrottyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2004-03-04· cited 23×
- Wright v. JeckleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2001-03-06· cited 20×
- Young v. SavidgeCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2010-04-27· cited 12×
- Williams v. Lifestyle Lift Holding, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-28· cited 10×
- Reed v. Anm Health CareCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2008-12-08· cited 6×
- Michael v. Mosquera-LacyCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-08-14· cited 4×
- Ambach v. FrenchCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2007-11-27· cited 4×
- Reed v. ANM HEALTH CARECourt of Appeals of Washington· 2009-01-12· cited 1×
- Elvira Williams, App. v. Scientific Image Center Management, Inc., Res.Court of Appeals of Washington· 2013-05-28
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Reid v. Pierce CountyWashington Supreme Court· 1998-09-03· cited 279×
- Eriks v. DenverWashington Supreme Court· 1992-02-20· cited 138×
- Cutler v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Washington Supreme Court· 1994-09-29· cited 137×
- Short v. DemopolisWashington Supreme Court· 1984-11-06· cited 134×
- Quimby v. FineCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1986-08-20· cited 60×
- Branom v. StateCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1999-04-05· cited 56×
- Estate of Sly v. LinvilleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1994-08-15· cited 32×
- Benoy v. SimonsCourt of Appeals of Washington· 1992-06-11· cited 22×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.