Skip to main content
M.D. Florida· 5/6/2019

Meyer v. Fay Servicing, LLC

Citations

  • 385 F. Supp. 3d 1235

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing requirements and statutory basis for standing under the FDCPA and FCCPA
  • finding it plausible that a “corporate advances” line item could be misleading under § 1692e and § 1692f when the collection letter did not include itemization of attorney’s fees, late charges, or other fees associated with the debt, which were contemplated by the line item
  • “affirmative defense[s] should ordinarily be asserted in a responsive pleading and considered after the facts are developed on summary judgment or at trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Chappell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

31 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.