Skip to main content

Metzler v. Rowell

Citations

  • 547 S.E.2d 311
  • 248 Ga. App. 596
  • 2001 Fulton County D. Rep. 1168
  • 2001 Ga. App. LEXIS 350

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing that the “threshold question of compliance with the anti-SLAPP [verification requirements] is decided on motion to dismiss or motion to strike,” which, this Court explained, “is analogous to the statutory mechanism of OCGA § 9-11-12 (b
  • harmonizing the dismissal procedure provided in Georgia’s anti-SLAPP statute with a traditional motion to dismiss or for summary judgment
  • trial court is authorized to receive evidence during an OCGA § 9-11-11.1 hearing without converting the motion to dismiss into one for summary judgment
  • OCGA § 9-11-11.1 “provides for a motion to dismiss and hearing on this issue”
  • Under former anti-SLAPP statute, attorney’s letter regarding litigation of a zoning matter was “in connection with an issue . . . under 9 consideration by a judicial body” and was thus protected speech.
  • “[T]he statute provides that a claim that could reasonably be construed as infringing upon these rights must be accompanied by a detailed verification and provides for a motion to dismiss and hearing on this issue.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Smith, Pope, Andrews, Johnson, Phipps, Eldridge, Barnes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

30 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

28 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.