Georgia Community Support & Solutions, Inc. v. Berryhill

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “the Anti-SLAPP statute does not encompass all statements that touch upon matters of public concern[,]” but requires that the statement “be made in relation to some official proceeding”
• aff'd in Berryhill v. Georgia Community Support & Solutions, 281 Ga. 439 (638 SE2d 278) (2006)
• antiSLAPP statute did not apply where there was no evidence that any official proceeding was ever involved, “either before or after [the defendant’s] statements”
• anti-SLAPP statute did not apply where there was no evidence that any official proceeding was ever involved, “either before or after [the defendant’s] statements”
• anti-SLAPP statute did not apply where there was no evidence that any official proceeding was ever involved, “either before or after [the defendant’s] statements”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).