Skip to main content
· 11/9/1998

Anderson v. Flake

Citations

  • 508 S.E.2d 650
  • 270 Ga. 141

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • under OCGA § 9-11-81, the CPA applies to all statutory proceedings “[i]n the absence of an express provision in the [relevant] statute that conflicts with the CPA”
  • under OCGA § 9-11-81, the CPA applies to all statutory proceedings “[i]n the absence of an express provision in the [relevant] statute that conflicts with the CPA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Thurbert E. Baker

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.