Metz v. Bae Systems Technology Solutions and Services Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that defendant’s alleged interference with plaintiff’s ability to seek employment with defendant’s non- competitors could not give rise to a claim for breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing because the contract did not contain such a right

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Metz v. BAE Systems Technology Solutions & Services Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2014-12-16· cited 47×
• Cummings v. Murphy
  District of Columbia· 2018-08-14
• McKinney v. District of Columbia
  District of Columbia· 2024-01-31

Cites

23 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Ashcroft v. Iqbal
  Supreme Court· 2009-05-18· cited 149,772×
• Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly
  Supreme Court· 2007-05-21· cited 146,720×
• Aktieselskabet Af 21. November 2001 v. Fame Jeans Inc.
  D.C. Circuit· 2008-04-29· cited 573×
• Paul v. Howard University
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-05-25· cited 179×
• Richard W. Shear v. The National Rifle Association of America, a New York Corporation
  D.C. Circuit· 1979-08-22· cited 177×
• Daisley v. Riggs Bank, N.A.
  District of Columbia· 2005-05-31· cited 96×
• Allworth v. Howard University
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2006-01-12· cited 93×
• Haddle v. Garrison
  Supreme Court· 1998-12-14· cited 91×
• Busby v. Capital One, N.A.
  District of Columbia· 2011-03-28· cited 67×
• Bible Way Church of Our Lord Jesus Christ of Apostolic Faith of Washington v. Beards
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-07-24· cited 65×
• McManus v. MCI Communications Corp.
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2000-04-13· cited 62×
• Hais v. Smith
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1988-09-21· cited 55×
• Onyeoziri v. Spivok
  District of Columbia Court of Appeals· 2012-05-24· cited 47×
• Riggs v. Home Builders Institute
  District of Columbia· 2002-03-18· cited 37×
• Zelaya v. UNICCO SERVICE COMPANY
  District of Columbia· 2008-11-26· cited 21×
• Ihebereme v. Capital One, N.A.
  District of Columbia· 2013-03-28· cited 20×
• Dale v. Thomason
  District of Columbia· 1997-04-10· cited 19×
• Robinson v. Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
  District of Columbia· 2013-03-25· cited 18×
• Daniels v. United States
  District of Columbia· 2013-05-30· cited 14×
• Mero v. City Segway Tours of Washington Dc, LLC
  District of Columbia· 2011-11-28· cited 14×