Onyeoziri v. Spivok

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that “[the fact-finder’s] task is to evaluate the evidence ... to determine whether the interference was improper under the circumstances” and considering the factors listed in the Restatement (Second
• stating that “[o]n this record,” the question whether appellees’ insistence on going ahead with a scheduled foreclosure after appellant secured a contract to sell the property “is not an issue that can be decided as a matter of law”
• listing the elements of intentional interference with business relations as the existence of a valid contract or business relationship; knowledge of the contract or relationship; intentional interference with the contract or relationship; and damages caused by the interference
• listing the elements of intentional interference with business relations as the existence of a valid contract or business relationship; knowledge of the contract or relationship; intentional interference with the contract or relationship; and damages caused by the interference
• “To be actionable, the interference need not cause an actual breach of the business relationship, but instead may cause ‘merely a failure of performance’ by one of the parties.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).