Haddle v. Garrison

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an at-will employee may sue under § 1985(2) for tortious interference with employment relationships
• holding that an at-will employee need not suffer an injury to a “constitutionally protected property interest to state a claim for damages under § 1985(2)”
• holding that a fired at-will employee did suffer an injury in his person or property within the meaning of 1985(2), reasoning that common law had long offered a remedy for such losses
• explaining that \third-party interference with at-will employment relationships ... has long been a compensable injury under tort law\
• explaining that “third-party interference with at-will employment relationships ... has long been a compen-sable injury under tort law”
• explaining that \third-party interference with at-will employment relationships . . . has long been a compensable injury under tort law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).