Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/1/1998
Metz v. Amoco Oil Co.
Citations
- 581 N.W.2d 597
- 1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 138
- 1998 WL 351573
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding error not preserved when “motion to vacate did not set forth any grounds on which relief could be granted”
- affirming dismissal of an action due to plaintiffs’ failure to comply with a court order establishing deadline for retaining new counsel
- “issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court”
- “Our preservation rule requires that issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court before they can be raised and decided on appeal.”
- “Our preservation rule requires that issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court before they can be raised and decided on appeal.”
- “Our preservation rule requires that issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court before they can be raised and decided on appeal.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Harris, Lavorato, Carter, Larson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.