Supreme Court of Iowa· 7/1/1998

Metz v. Amoco Oil Co.

Citations

581 N.W.2d 597
1998 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 138
1998 WL 351573

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding error not preserved when “motion to vacate did not set forth any grounds on which relief could be granted”
affirming dismissal of an action due to plaintiffs’ failure to comply with a court order establishing deadline for retaining new counsel
“issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court”
“Our preservation rule requires that issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court before they can be raised and decided on appeal.”
“Our preservation rule requires that issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court before they can be raised and decided on appeal.”
“Our preservation rule requires that issues must be presented to and passed upon by the district court before they can be raised and decided on appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harris, Lavorato, Carter, Larson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

32 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.