Henning v. Security Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that in a case tried at law, the district court’s findings are binding on appeal if supported by substantial evidence
• absent contractual privity with a homeowner, a subcontractor has no valid quasi-contract claim against the homeowner
• unjust enrichment is a “modern designation ] for the older terms of quasi contracts or contracts implied in law”
• standard of review on appeal is governed by how parties tried the case in district court
• unjust enrichment is a \modern designation[] for the older terms of quasi contracts or contracts implied in law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).