First Circuit· 3/30/2004
Metts v. Almond
Citations
- 363 F.3d 8
- 2004 U.S. App. LEXIS 5845
- 2004 WL 626716
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- affirming dismissal of Section 1985 claim where “complaint [was] 11 devoid of any discussion of an agreement amongst the [defendants] to violate [plaintiff’s] 12 constitutional rights”
- “[T]o state a claim for conspiracy under § 1985, a plaintiff must first 11 have a cognizable claim under § 1983.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Boudin, Torruella, Selya, Stahl, Lynch, Lipez, Howard
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court· 2009-03-09· cited 2,505×
- Dávila v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión PúblicaFirst Circuit· 2007-08-07· cited 314×
- Calla Wright v. State of North CarolinaFourth Circuit· 2015-05-27· cited 85×
- Joseph Thomas v. Phil BryantFifth Circuit· 2019-09-03· cited 7×
- Common Cause v. RuchoM.D. North Carolina· 2017-03-03· cited 4×
- Int'l Refugee Assistance Project v. TrumpD. Maryland· 2019-05-02· cited 4×
- Chestnut v. MerrillN.D. Alabama· 2019-03-27· cited 4×
- Huot v. City of LowellD. Massachusetts· 2017-11-21· cited 1×
Cites
17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court· 1986-06-30· cited 1,221×
- Johnson v. De GrandySupreme Court· 1994-06-30· cited 1,107×
- Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court· 1993-02-23· cited 465×
- Voinovich v. QuilterSupreme Court· 1993-03-02· cited 379×
- Beer v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1976-03-30· cited 324×
- Abrams v. JohnsonSupreme Court· 1997-06-19· cited 233×
- Reno v. Bossier Parish School BoardSupreme Court· 1997-05-12· cited 215×
- Frank McNeil Individually and as Representatives of a Certified Class v. Springfield Park District and Springfield School District No. 186, DefendantsSeventh Circuit· 1988-09-21· cited 120×
- Volma Overton, and Ernesto Calderon, Plaintiffs-Intervenors-Appellants v. City of Austin, and Black Citizens Task Force, Defendant-Intervenor-AppelleeFifth Circuit· 1989-05-01· cited 90×
- Vecinos De Barrio Uno v. City of HolyokeFirst Circuit· 1995-12-29· cited 87×
- Maxine B. Cousin v. Don Sundquist State Election Commission Brook Thompson Hamilton County Election Commission Carolyn JacksonSixth Circuit· 1998-07-10· cited 51×
- Perry v. New England Business Service, Inc.First Circuit· 2003-10-23· cited 44×
- Turner v. State of Ark.E.D. Arkansas· 1991-11-15· cited 41×
- Parker v. OhioS.D. Ohio· 2003-05-23· cited 28×
- Brooks v. MillerEleventh Circuit· 1998-10-30· cited 17×
- Metts v. AlmondD. Rhode Island· 2002-09-09· cited 6×
- Parker v. OhioSupreme Court· 2003-11-17· cited 3×
Other cases named Metts v. Almond
3 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.