Dávila v. Corporación De Puerto Rico Para La Difusión Pública

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “[w]hen assessing a claim of pretext in an employment discrimination case, a court’s focus is necessarily on the motivations and perceptions of the decisionmaker”
• holding that the termination of an employee was not pretextual when there was no evidence of complicity between the actual decisionmaker and another supervisor shown to have discriminatory animus
• Finding that an argument was forfeited because “[t]he appellant did not present it to the district court.”
• explaining that “proof of a mistaken judgment” as to the reason for discharge does not give rise to an inference of discriminatory discharge
• explaining that “proof of a mistaken judgment” as to the reason for discharge does not give rise to an inference of discriminatory discharge
• reasoning that the differences between Law 100 and the ADEA are immaterial when Plaintiff has proffered no evidence of age-based discriminatory animus

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).