Skip to main content
· 9/15/1999

Meng v. Ipanema Shoe Corp.

Citations

  • 73 F. Supp. 2d 392
  • 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14283
  • 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 102
  • 1999 WL 717984

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting in the Title VII context that “a common benefits package speaks only to economies of scale”
  • “[A] common benefits package speaks only to economies of scale and not to centralized control of labor relations.” (internal quotation marks omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scheindlin

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.