· 9/15/1999
Meng v. Ipanema Shoe Corp.
Citations
- 73 F. Supp. 2d 392
- 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 14283
- 81 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 102
- 1999 WL 717984
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting in the Title VII context that “a common benefits package speaks only to economies of scale”
- “[A] common benefits package speaks only to economies of scale and not to centralized control of labor relations.” (internal quotation marks omitted)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Scheindlin
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.