Skip to main content
· 9/23/1998

Bonnie M. KERZER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. KINGLY MANUFACTURING, Defendant-Appellee

Citations

  • 156 F.3d 396
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 23550
  • 74 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,539
  • 77 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1713
  • 1998 WL 652334

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding a genuine question as to pretext based on (1) supervisor’s specific negative comments about the Plaintiff’s pregnancy, (2) an allegation that the supervisor became unfriendly following the Plaintiff’s pregnancy announcement, (3
  • “Conelusory allegations, conjecture, and speculation ... are insufficient to create a genuine issue of fact.”
  • “Conclusory allegations, conjecture and speculation ... are insufficient to create a genuine issue of fact.”
  • “[A] plaintiff may establish a prima facie case by demonstrating that the discharge occurred in circumstances giving rise to an inference of unlawful discrimination.”
  • “Conclusory allegations, conjecture, and speculation . . . are insufficient to create a genuine issue of fact.”
  • “Conclusory allegations, conjecture, and speculation, however, are insufficient to create a genuine issue of fact.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Winter, Dorsey, Jones

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.