Nevada Supreme Court· 10/29/2009

Mendoza-Lobos v. State

Citations

218 P.3d 501
125 Nev. 634
125 Nev. Adv. Rep. 49
2009 Nev. LEXIS 54

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that it was not plain error where the district court's failure to make findings regarding the sentencing enhancement did not affect the sentencing decision
holding that it was not plain error where the district court's failure to make findings regarding the sentencing enhancement did not affect the sentencing decision
holding that the district court must make findings on the record on the NRS 193.165(1) factors but failure to do so will not warrant a new sentencing hearing where defendant fails to show that the error affected the sentencing decision
holding that the district court must make findings on the record on the NRS 193.165(1) factors but failure to do so will not warrant a new sentencing hearing where defendant fails to show that the error affected the sentencing decision
holding there was no plain error 9 when the district court’s failure to make findings did not affect the sentencing decision
holding that questions of statutory interpretation are reviewed de novo

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hardesty, Douglas, Parraguirre, Pickering, Cherry, Saitta, Gibbons

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

24 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

40 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.