Megel v. Donaldson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• in light of merger clause, appellant was “estopped from asserting that she relied upon [appellee’s] earlier promises”
• “[N]o construction [of a contract] is required or even permitted when the language employed by the parties in the contract is plain, unambiguous, and capable of only one reasonable interpretation.” (punctuation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).