TRIPLE T-BAR, LLC Et Al. v. DDR SOUTHEAST SPRINGFIELD, LLC

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding guarantors’ arguments that a guaranty failed because it was not notarized and because the guarantors did not initial every page meritless because the guarantors did not provide supporting authority and théir signatures were plainly on the document
• affiant failed to lay a proper foundation for admission of lease agreement and guaranty where the 8 affiant offered no testimony establishing that the documents were made in the regular course of business

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).