Skip to main content
· 3/16/2005

Medrad, Inc. v. Mri Devices Corp.

Citations

  • 401 F.3d 1313
  • 74 U.S.P.Q. 2d (BNA) 1184
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 4309
  • 2005 WL 605532

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “We cannot look at the ordinary meaning of the term . . . in a vacuum. Rather, we must look at the ordinary meaning in the context of the written description and the prosecution history.”
  • “We cannot look at the ordinary meaning of the term . . . in a vacuum. Rather, we must look at the ordinary meaning in the context of the written description and the prosecution history.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Rader, Friedman, Bryson

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.