Federal Circuit· 4/6/2018
Knowles Electronics LLC v. Iancu
Citations
- 886 F.3d 1369
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that \we need not address the appellant's conditional [invalidity] arguments\ where the lower tribunal \did not err in its construction of [a] disputed limitation\ (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
- explaining that “we need not ad- dress the appellant’s conditional [invalidity] arguments” where the lower tribunal “did not err in its construction of [a] disputed limitation” (internal quotation marks, brack- ets, and citation omitted)
- “Because we conclude that the PTAB did not err in its construction of the disputed limitation, we need not address the appellant’s conditional arguments as to the PTAB’s unpatentability determina- tions.” (internal quotation marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
- “Because we conclude that the PTAB did not err in its construction of the disputed limitation, we need not address the appellant’s conditional arguments as to the PTAB’s unpatentability determinations.” (internal quota- tion marks, brackets, and citation omitted)
- discussing the relevance of prosecution history in claim construction
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Newman, Clevenger, Wallach
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
5 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. Actavis LLCFederal Circuit· 2019-05-03· cited 17×
- Btg International Limited v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLCFederal Circuit· 2019-05-14· cited 17×
- Apple Inc. v. Andrea Electronics CorporationFederal Circuit· 2020-02-07
- Plastronics Socket Partners Ltd. v. Highrel Inc.D. Arizona· 2019-05-22
- Polaris Innovations Limited v. BrentFederal Circuit· 2022-09-15
Cites
48 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court· 1992-06-12· cited 24,791×
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court· 1938-12-05· cited 12,026×
- Spokeo, Inc. v. RobinsSupreme Court· 2016-05-16· cited 7,043×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1943-02-01· cited 3,975×
- United States v. CottonSupreme Court· 2002-05-20· cited 3,303×
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossFederal Circuit· 2006-02-21· cited 3,273×
- DaimlerChrysler Corp. v. CunoSupreme Court· 2006-05-15· cited 2,657×
- Summers v. Earth Island InstituteSupreme Court· 2009-03-03· cited 2,335×
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court· 1973-03-26· cited 2,333×
- Arizonans for Official English v. ArizonaSupreme Court· 1997-03-03· cited 2,323×
- Bender v. Williamsport Area School DistrictSupreme Court· 1986-05-19· cited 2,256×
- Florida Power & Light Co. v. LorionSupreme Court· 1985-03-20· cited 1,823×
- Gladstone, Realtors v. Village of BellwoodSupreme Court· 1979-04-17· cited 1,761×
- Raines v. ByrdSupreme Court· 1997-06-26· cited 1,682×
- Whitman v. American Trucking Assns., Inc.Supreme Court· 2001-02-27· cited 1,439×
- KSR International Co. v. Teleflex Inc.Supreme Court· 2007-04-30· cited 1,310×
- Davis v. Federal Election CommissionSupreme Court· 2008-06-26· cited 1,183×
- Diamond v. CharlesSupreme Court· 1986-04-30· cited 1,118×
- Hollingsworth v. PerrySupreme Court· 2013-06-26· cited 967×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.