McQuilken v. a & R DEVELOPMENT CORP.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• joinder of approximately 375 plaintiffs residing in over 150 dwellings would be impracticable and unnecessary; noting that joinder of even a lesser number had been held to be impracticable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Findley v. Blinken (In Re Joint Eastern & Southern District Asbestos Litigation)
  S.D. New York· 1991-06-27· cited 113×
• In re Asbestos School Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1984-09-28· cited 95×
• Boggs v. Divested Atomic Corp.
  S.D. Ohio· 1991-11-07· cited 78×
• Smith v. MCI Telecommunications Corp.
  D. Kansas· 1989-02-23· cited 55×
• Jenkins v. Raymark Industries, Inc.
  E.D. Texas· 1985-10-16· cited 35×
• Piccolini v. Simon's Wrecking
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-03-22· cited 30×
• In Re One Meridian Plaza Fire Litigation
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1993-04-15· cited 26×
• Sala v. National Railroad Passenger Corp.
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1988-04-29· cited 23×
• Fechter v. HMW Industries
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-08-31· cited 11×
• Safran v. United Steelworkers of America
  W.D. Pennsylvania· 1989-10-31· cited 10×
• Doyle v. Fluor Corp.
  Missouri Court of Appeals· 2006-06-27· cited 9×
• Troutman v. Cohen
  E.D. Pennsylvania· 1987-04-07· cited 8×
• Rode v. United States
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 1992-11-25· cited 6×
• Tiongco v. Southwestern Energy Production Co.
  M.D. Pennsylvania· 2016-10-14· cited 4×
• Bessinger v. United States
  D. South Carolina· 2006-08-09
• Brewster v. Highway Materials Inc.
  Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas· 2009-03-17