Doyle v. Fluor Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Although individual questions of damages or individual defenses may remain after the common issues here are resolved, the need for individualized proof ... does not defeat the predominance of the common issues.”
• “Although individual questions of damages or individual defenses may remain after the common issues here are resolved, the need for individualized proof . . . does not defeat the predominance of the common issues.”
• “Although individual questions of damages or individual defenses 37 may remain after the common issues here are resolved, the need for individualized proof . . . does not defeat the predominance of the common issues.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).