District of Columbia· 8/10/2007
McQueen v. Woodstream Corp.
Citations
- 244 F.R.D. 26
- 2007 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 58119
- 2007 WL 2284747
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that venue in the District of Columbia was proper because “[t]he communications between the parties transmitted to and from the District of Columbia were 7 critical to the defendant’s alleged fraudulent undertaking.”
- holding product developer’s claim time-barred because “discovery rule… 9 does not apply to unjust enrichment claims” (citing Thompsen, 878 A.2d at 1225)
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Urbina
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-10-17· cited 93×
- Kemp v. EilandDistrict of Columbia· 2015-09-30· cited 22×
- Kettey v. Saudi Ministry of EducationDistrict of Columbia· 2014-06-27· cited 13×
- Taylor v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District of Columbia· 2015-03-25· cited 12×
- Stephens v. US Airways GroupDistrict of Columbia· 2008-05-20· cited 9×
- McQueen v. Woodstream Corp.District of Columbia· 2009-12-09· cited 7×
- Nabong v. PaddayumanD.C. Circuit· 2018-02-05· cited 4×
- Doe v. RumsfeldDistrict of Columbia· 2011-08-02· cited 3×
- Vila v. INTER-AMERICAN INVESTMENT, CORP.District of Columbia· 2009-01-26· cited 2×
- ESTRADA v. KRIZCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma· 2015-01-29· cited 2×
- Shallal v. GatesDistrict of Columbia· 2008-07-23· cited 1×
- Vila v. Inter-American Investment CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2009-01-26
- Nabong v. PaddayumanDistrict of Columbia· 2018-02-05
- Toggas v. Wachovia Mortgage, FsbDistrict of Columbia· 2020-06-11
- Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2023-07-21
- Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCDistrict of Columbia· 2024-08-28
- Acon-Chen v. ButtigiegDistrict of Columbia· 2024-10-05
Cites
42 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court· 2002-02-26· cited 8,748×
- Charles Kowal v. MCI Communications CorporationD.C. Circuit· 1994-03-01· cited 1,980×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 95,228 Rocco Dileo and Louise Dileo v. Ernst & YoungSeventh Circuit· 1990-06-12· cited 1,050×
- Howard Wool v. Tandem Computers Incorporated, Robert C. Marshall, Henry v. Morgan, and James G. TreybigNinth Circuit· 1987-06-03· cited 673×
- Vicom, Inc. v. Harbridge Merchant Services, Inc., as Successor in Interest to Peach Tree Bancard Corporation, Judy Elliot, James ElliotSeventh Circuit· 1994-04-05· cited 659×
- Jane Doe v. United States Department of JusticeD.C. Circuit· 1985-03-01· cited 471×
- Smith-Haynie, J. C. v. Davis, AddisonD.C. Circuit· 1998-09-22· cited 417×
- American Nurses' Association v. State of IllinoisSeventh Circuit· 1986-04-04· cited 272×
- Peter Paul Mitrano v. Christopher J. Hawes, D/B/A Cjh Color and Design GroupFourth Circuit· 2004-07-26· cited 259×
- United States of America Ex Rel. Joel D. Joseph, and Joel D. Joseph v. Howard W. CannonD.C. Circuit· 1981-01-30· cited 236×
- United States v. Employing Plasterers Assn. of ChicagoSupreme Court· 1954-03-08· cited 225×
- Robert v. Baer v. David Chase Chase Films Inc., a Delaware Corporation John Does A-ZThird Circuit· 2004-12-21· cited 219×
- Schaller Telephone Company v. Golden Sky Systems, Inc.Eighth Circuit· 2002-09-04· cited 193×
- United States v. Hicks, Eric A.D.C. Circuit· 2002-03-26· cited 181×
- J. J. Blonien & Associates, Inc. v. Community Newspapers, Inc.Supreme Court· 1990-10-29· cited 175×
- Mitchell v. E-Z Way Towers, Inc.Fifth Circuit· 1959-07-30· cited 162×
- United States Ex Rel. Totten v. Bombardier Corp.D.C. Circuit· 2002-04-16· cited 161×
- U.S. Titan, Inc. v. Guangzhou Zhen Hua Shipping Co., Ltd.Second Circuit· 2001-02-15· cited 144×
- Diamond v. DavisDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1996-02-20· cited 136×
Other cases named McQueen v. Woodstream Corp.
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.