Cheeks v. Fort Myer Construction Corporation

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a complaint that “contain[ed] no listing of counts or causes of action” and was “unclear which law form[ed] the basis for each of plaintiffs’ various claims” did not satisfy Rule 8
• “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.”
• “A confused and rambling narrative of charges and conclusions . . . does not comply with the requirements of Rule 8.”
• “Courts are reluctant to compel a more definite statement pursuant to Rule 12(e) and to prevent Rule 12(e

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).