Skip to main content

McQueen v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 948 S.W.2d 415
  • 1997 Ky. LEXIS 77
  • 1997 WL 395391

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that CR 60.02 is not a -5- separate avenue of appeal in addition to other remedies but is available only to raise issues which cannot be raised in other proceedings
  • acknowledging CR 60.02 relief remains available for extraordinary claims not otherwise subject to review
  • “The obvious purpose of this -5- principle is to prevent the relitigation of issues which either were or could have been litigated in a similar proceeding.”
  • “even if these facts [of rehabilitation] were proven, they would afford no basis for relieving Appellant from the punishment legally imposed for the crimes which he has committed”
  • “CR 60.02 is not a separate avenue of appeal to be pursued in addition to other remedies, but is available only to raise issues which cannot be raised in other -8- proceedings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.