Kentucky Supreme Court· 6/26/1997
McQueen v. Commonwealth
Citations
- 948 S.W.2d 415
- 1997 Ky. LEXIS 77
- 1997 WL 395391
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that CR 60.02 is not a -5- separate avenue of appeal in addition to other remedies but is available only to raise issues which cannot be raised in other proceedings
- acknowledging CR 60.02 relief remains available for extraordinary claims not otherwise subject to review
- “The obvious purpose of this -5- principle is to prevent the relitigation of issues which either were or could have been litigated in a similar proceeding.”
- “even if these facts [of rehabilitation] were proven, they would afford no basis for relieving Appellant from the punishment legally imposed for the crimes which he has committed”
- “CR 60.02 is not a separate avenue of appeal to be pursued in addition to other remedies, but is available only to raise issues which cannot be raised in other -8- proceedings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robert
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
21 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Foley v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2014-03-20· cited 169×
- Bowling v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2005-04-22· cited 107×
- Barnett v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1998-10-15· cited 85×
- White v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2000-04-28· cited 69×
- Stoker v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-03-27· cited 44×
- Baze v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2008-11-26· cited 41×
- Owens v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2017-01-27· cited 41×
- McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1997-06-30· cited 32×
- Land v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1999-02-18· cited 20×
- Sanders v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 2002-06-13· cited 18×
- Faris v. StoneKentucky Supreme Court· 2003-06-11· cited 13×
- Goldsmith v. Fifth Third BankCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-10-30· cited 12×
- Kentucky Retirement Systems v. FosterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2010-07-23· cited 10×
- Mauldin v. BeardenKentucky Supreme Court· 2009-08-27· cited 8×
- Wilson v. WebbSixth Circuit· 2004-08-13· cited 3×
- Campbell v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2009-10-30· cited 2×
- Stanfill v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2016-06-24· cited 1×
- Chatman v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2018-11-30· cited 1×
- Jt Higgins v. Commonwealth of KentuckyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-07-18
- Barry A. Saturday v. Tyler Murphy, in His Official Capacity as Chair of the Fayette County Board of EducationCourt of Appeals of Kentucky· 2025-08-29
Cites
9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court· 1963-05-13· cited 33,902×
- Harold McQueen Jr. v. Gene Scroggy, WardenSixth Circuit· 1996-12-30· cited 316×
- Gross v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1983-03-30· cited 274×
- McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1984-02-16· cited 112×
- McQueen v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1986-09-25· cited 64×
- Jacobs v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court· 1994-01-31· cited 61×
- State v. RichmondArizona Supreme Court· 1994-12-15· cited 28×
- Polsgrove v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)· 1969-05-02· cited 12×
- Fryrear v. ParkerKentucky Supreme Court· 1996-01-18· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.