Stoker v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Our rules of civil procedure do not permit successive motions or the relitigation of issues which could have been raised in prior proceedings.”
• “[W]e may affirm a trial court’s ruling despite the fact that it reached the correct result for the wrong reason.”
• “An evidentiary hearing is not required to assess the reasonable time restriction inherent in CR 60.02 motions as such is left -6- to the discretion of the Court.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).