Faris v. Stone

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a CR 60.02 motion will not toll the statute of limitations in KRS 413.245
• stating “[a]s Ms. Faris was not aware of the alleged malpractice at this time, the date of discovery governs commencement of the limitation period. Thus, the one-year period began when she learned that her case had been negligently practiced!] ]”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).