Peters Corp. v. New Mexico Banquest Investors Corp.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We review a trial court’s decision not to award punitive damages for abuse of discretion, and we will only reverse that decision if it is ‘contrary to logic and reason.’” (citations omitted)
• “We review a trial court’s decision not to award punitive damages for abuse of discretion, and we will only reverse that decision if it is ‘contrary to logic and reason.’ ” (quoting N.M. Hosp. Ass’n v. A.T. & S.F. Mem’l Hosps., Inc., 105 N.M. 508, 734 P.2d 748, 753 (1987))
• ―We review a trial court‘s decision not to award punitive damages for abuse of discretion, and we will only reverse that decision if it is ‗contrary to logic and reason.‘ ‖ (quoting N.M. Hosp. Ass’n v. A.T. & S.F. Mem’l Hosps., Inc., 734 P.2d 748, 753 (N.M. 1987))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).