McLellan v. McLellan

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[Fjederal law does not prevent a husband and wife from entering into an agreement to provide a set level of payments, the amount of which is determined by considering disability benefits as well as retirement benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Selitsch v. Selitsch
  Court of Appeals of Tennessee· 2015-10-14· cited 25×
• Coon v. Coon
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2003-09-22· cited 9×
• Andrew Weiser, Appellant/cross v. Michelle Weiser, Respondent/cross
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 2020-10-27
• Michael B. Yourko v. Lee Ann B. Yourko
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 2021-12-21
• Yourko v. Yourko
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 2023-03-30

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• McCarty v. McCarty
  Supreme Court· 1981-06-26· cited 1,052×
• Mansell v. Mansell
  Supreme Court· 1989-05-30· cited 626×
• Morrison v. Bestler
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1990-01-12· cited 225×
• Mary Anne Rowe v. Charles S. Rowe
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1997-02-04· cited 112×
• Fry v. Schwarting
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1987-04-21· cited 103×
• Earley v. Landsidle
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1999-02-26· cited 80×
• Holmes v. Holmes
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1989-01-04· cited 71×
• Renner Plumbing, Heating & Air Conditioning, Inc. v. Renner
  Supreme Court of Virginia· 1983-06-17· cited 64×
• Owen v. Owen
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1992-06-09· cited 39×
• Lambert v. Lambert
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1990-07-31· cited 37×
• Gayler v. Gayler
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1995-03-28· cited 29×
• Cook v. Cook
  Court of Appeals of Virginia· 1994-08-02· cited 28×