Hungry Wolf/Sugar & Spice, Inc. v. Langdeau

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court’s decision to admit or exclude evidence on summary judgment is reviewed for abuse of discretion
• trial court abuses its discretion where its application of the legal standard is incomplete

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Smith v. Bell.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-06-07· cited 7×
• Samadi v. Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2017-12-14· cited 6×
• BRENDA STEWARD v. LIBORIA ARANDIA
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2021-06-30
• Myra Little v. Jim-Lar Corporation
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2019-10-30

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Cowart v. Widener
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2010-07-12· cited 430×
• Steed v. Federal National Mortgage Corp.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-12-30· cited 42×
• Koules v. Sp5 Atlantic Retail Ventures, LLC.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-12-12· cited 28×
• Baker v. Simon Property Group, Inc.
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-05-24· cited 24×
• Dalton v. City of Marietta
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2006-06-12· cited 23×
• Capital City Developers, LLC v. Bank of North Georgia
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-07-05· cited 19×
• Jaycee Atlanta Development, LLC v. Providence Bank
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2014-11-21· cited 15×
• Maloof v. Metropolitan Atlanta Rapid Transit Authority
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2015-03-03· cited 11×
• McKinley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2010-03-26· cited 5×