McHugh v. McHugh
Citations
- 186 Pa. 197
- 40 A. 410
- 1898 Pa. LEXIS 980
Syllabus
<p>Evidence — Tampering with witnesses — Corruption of jurors.</p> <p>A party to a canse may show that at a previous trial the adverse party attempted to induce witnesses to swear falsely, and also attempted to corrupt jurors; and it is immaterial that the party so misconducting himself was acting in the case as an executor or in some representative capacity.</p> <p>Evidence of the misconduct of a party in connection with the trial of a case is admissible as tending to show that the party guilty of the misconduct is unwilling to rely on the truth of his cause, or is conscious that it is an unjust one.</p>
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- evidence defendant had attempted to procure false testimony and influence jurors admissible as tending to show the party was conscious her cause was an unjust one
- “[t]he spoliation of papers and the destruction or withholding of evidence which a party ought to produce gives rise to a presumption unfavorable to him. . . .”
- spoliation of evidence by party gives rise to adverse inference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Dean, Feel, Fell, Gbeen, Mitchell, Stebbett
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
26 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Pyeritz v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 2011-11-23· cited 160×
- Commonwealth v. GoldblumSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-07-02· cited 103×
- Beers v. Bayliner Marine Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-05-07· cited 91×
- Schroeder v. Com., Dept. of Transp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1998-04-01· cited 83×
- Commonwealth v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1903-10-05· cited 62×
- Commonwealth v. PestinikasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1992-12-10· cited 47×
- Duquesne Light Co. v. Woodland Hills School DistrictCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania· 1997-09-12· cited 47×
- Pioneer Commercial Funding Corp. v. American Financial Mortgage Corp.Superior Court of Pennsylvania· 2002-03-18· cited 34×
- Scranton City v. Peoples Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1922-03-27· cited 31×
- Power v. GroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-07-06· cited 30×
- Wills v. HardcastleSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-03-14· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 29×
- Gung You v. NagleNinth Circuit· 1929-09-23· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-02· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. OlitskySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1957-06-11· cited 22×
- Green v. BrooksSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-05-24· cited 20×
- Meyer v. McDonnellCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1978-11-02· cited 19×
- Ginder v. BachmanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-10-10· cited 18×
- McHugh v. AudetM.D. Pennsylvania· 1947-07-03· cited 16×
- United States v. KatzM.D. Pennsylvania· 1948-06-22· cited 10×
Cites
6 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Chicago City Railway Co. v. McMahonIllinois Supreme Court· 1882-06-21· cited 43×
- Brown v. SchockSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1875-03-08· cited 26×
- Winchell v. EdwardsIllinois Supreme Court· 1870-09-15· cited 21×
- Hastings v. StetsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1881-01-06· cited 20×
- Heslop v. HeslopSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1877-01-02· cited 9×
- Egan v. BowkerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1862-11-15· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.