Commonwealth v. Brown
Citations
- 23 Pa. Super. 470
- 1903 Pa. Super. LEXIS 101
Syllabus
<p>Criminal lato — Parlies—Description of parlies — Indictment—School law.</p> <p>As the city of Philadelphia is coterminus with the county, and constitutes a single school district, and as each ward of the city constitutes what is called a “ school section ” for which there is a board of directors, an indictment against three directors is not defective because the defendants are described as “ directors of the public schools of the twenty-eighth ward of the city of Philadelphia. ”</p> <p>Criminal law — Conspiracy—Evidence.</p> <p>In order to render the offense of conspiracy complete there is no occasion that any act should be done, or that any one should be aggrieved or defrauded in pursuance or in consequence of the unlawful agreement.</p> <p>Criminal law — Conspiracy—Indictment—Extortion.</p> <p>An indictment charged in apt language a corrupt conspiracy to extort, receive and take money, by color of their offices, from certain persons, naming them, and others whose names were unknown, “ as and for fees and rewards, emoluments and pay for obtaining and procuring the election of them .... to the position of school-teacher's ” in the public schools of said ward. Held that the indictment was not bad because it did not state that the payment was not made voluntarily, or because it did not allege that the money taken was claimed to be as a fee for official services.</p> <p>An indictment against school directors for conspiracy to commit extortion by taking fees and rewards for procuring the election of persons to the position of school-teacher, the indictment is not bad because it does not contain the words “ extort ” or ‘ ‘ extorsively ” as descriptive of the offense, nor is it bad because it does not allege that any money was taken from the persons appointed school-teachers, as afee for official services.</p> <p>Criminal law — Extortion—Common-law offense — School law.</p> <p>Extortion is the corrupt demanding or receiving by a person in office of a fee for services w
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defendants charged with and convicted of conspiracy to extort because they accepted pay for obtaining and procuring the election of certain persons to the position of schoolteachers
- defendants charged with and convicted of conspiracy to extort because they accepted pay for obtaining and procuring the election of certain persons to the position of schoolteachers
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Beaver, Henderson, Morrison, Orlady, Porter, Rice
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
38 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Evans v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1992-05-26· cited 423×
- United States v. ForsytheThird Circuit· 1977-08-04· cited 174×
- Commonwealth v. LopinsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1967-09-26· cited 157×
- Commonwealth v. EnglandSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-07-08· cited 119×
- Commonwealth v. McGrewSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1953-11-17· cited 93×
- Commonwealth v. O'BRIENSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1956-08-17· cited 77×
- Commonwealth v. KirkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1940-07-19· cited 54×
- Commonwealth v. PittmanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1983-10-14· cited 41×
- Commonwealth v. WilsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-01-13· cited 31×
- Power v. GroganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1911-07-06· cited 30×
- Commonwealth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1972-04-20· cited 29×
- Commonwealth v. BrownmillerSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1939-09-25· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. HendersonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1913-11-07· cited 24×
- Commonwealth v. KnappSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1988-05-02· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. SchultzSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1952-03-18· cited 22×
- Commonwealth v. RamseySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1910-03-03· cited 19×
- Commonwealth v. DumasSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1982-05-14· cited 17×
- Commonwealth v. SharplessSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1906-05-14· cited 15×
- Commonwealth v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1924-03-10· cited 14×
- Commonwealth v. KilgallenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1954-01-19· cited 12×
Cites
22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- St. Clair v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1894-05-26· cited 193×
- Commonwealth v. GreenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1889-05-27· cited 81×
- Commonwealth v. PiperMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1876-03-20· cited 67×
- Commonwealth v. BartilsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1877-11-13· cited 55×
- McHugh v. McHughSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1898-05-16· cited 42×
- Turpin v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1881-02-11· cited 42×
- Heine v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1879-10-06· cited 38×
- Commonwealth v. KaySuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-07-26· cited 30×
- Walsh v. PeopleIllinois Supreme Court· 1872-09-15· cited 27×
- Commonwealth v. ZuernSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1901-03-19· cited 25×
- Commonwealth v. HurdSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1896-10-05· cited 16×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1831-11-15· cited 16×
- Commonwealth v. SheppardSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1902-05-22· cited 13×
- Haines v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1882-10-02· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. LlewellynSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-07-26· cited 11×
- Commonwealth v. BeldhamSuperior Court of Pennsylvania· 1900-07-26· cited 9×
- White v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia· 1876-01-15· cited 7×
- Mifflin v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1843-05-15· cited 7×
- Clary v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1846-10-21· cited 4×
- Twitchell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1848-10-28· cited 4×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.